I don't know about "everything": how many tedious meetings do they have?
As for NYU's compensation practrices, the "understandably infuriated readers" mentioned in the article should really hate this: "A Dastardly Clever Scheme".
The recent placement record of Princeton's economic department. Harvard's.
A short video advertisement for a graduate economics textbook. (Who knew Recursive Macroeconomics could sound so interesting?)
And this, worthy of a research project: "Can any older professors give perspective on all this grade whining?"
GW law professor Daniel J. Solove replies to an argument commonly advanced these days: "Only if you're doing something wrong should you worry, and then you don't deserve to keep it private."
Another Solove piece in the Washington Post. And another, a law review article, exploring the issue at greater length.
(Link fixed now. Thanks, Dave.)
Amen to this.
All throughout the country, unions are pounding tech companies with regulation: taxi unions oppose smart-phone ridesharing apps, hotel unions have threatened apartment owners who rent out their rooms, and college faculty unions are fighting low-cost online courses.
At least unions are honest: the best (and perhaps only) way to fight inequality is to stall progress.
But slowing technology will rob us of a more educated and innovative society. For instance, White House Science Fair Awardee, 17-year-old Brittany Wenger, designed a low-cost way to radically increase early cancer detection. Wenger told me that she taught herself advanced computer programming with the help of web tutorials—resources she never would have had at even the best high schools.
Monaco has an unfair advantage in recruiting top soccer talent: players move to avoid high taxes.
So do corporations.
And so are--soon probably a lot more will--Americans. (Bonus follow-on to that link: "Midland Ain't Pretty, But It Works".)
Most interesting of all: guess who's having second thoughts about nuclear?
Well, it's not really "versus" because Mr. Mauldin doesn't provide the full text of John Seater's comments. It's understandable that he didn't want to copy into his column what I'd guess was were lengthy comments, but he should have posted them on his website and provided readers with a link so they could judge the dispute for themselves.
And while it's ad hominem, Mr. Mauldin seems to be an entertainer and a world-class schmoozer--not that there's anything wrong with that--so if John's full comments were available, I'm nearly certain he'd win.
I excerpted him here.
BBC News[!] provides a pretty good answer: "10 Reasons Why So Many People Are Moving to Texas".
Bonus: "17 Reasons Why Houston is the Best City in America".
The dumb money is learning it's dumb and is taking steps toward becoming really smart. But if they become smarter, that will create more opportunities for the "smart" people to become even smarter, making the dumb people relatively dumber. Again.
Got it?
Not what you think. (Link via Instapundit.)
Another one of Mother Nature's jokes, kinda like that difference in the ages of sexual peaks.
The Cult, live in London, 1987. Live in Austin, 2012. Compare and contrast. There will be a quiz later.
(Also, the album version. There's a reason why most albums are recorded in studios with sound engineers.)
The dessert is made from sheeted pastry dough, like a croissant, and fried like a doughnut. The pastry is then stuffed with vanilla cream, rolled in sugar, and topped with icing.
But I, for one, won't hold my breath.