Interesting idea: what is your pick for the "perfect album"? (Defined as an album with no weak tracks.)
I don't think I have one. The closest I can get is probably "It's Too Late to Stop Now."
« Tim Worstall, Krugman, and my two cents | Main | »
Interesting idea: what is your pick for the "perfect album"? (Defined as an album with no weak tracks.)
I don't think I have one. The closest I can get is probably "It's Too Late to Stop Now."
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9b9953ef00e5502027e78833
» The Perfect Album? from Market Power
Craig Newmark wonders what the perfect album is (an album with no weak tracks). I'd list Pink Floyd's The Wall, Guns and Roses's Appetite for Destruction, Metallica's black album, Van Halen's debut, AC/DC's Back in Black, Rush's 2112, and Iron [Read More]
The comments to this entry are closed.
My pick: Overnight Sensation by Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention. Either that or Toscanini's rendition of Beethoven's 3rd Symphony.
Posted by: The Eclectic Econoclast | September 09, 2005 at 06:26 AM
I like hard rock/metal. GNR's Appetite for Destruction is one that I'd pick, along with Metallica's black album and Iron Maiden's Killers.
Posted by: Phil Miller | September 09, 2005 at 09:07 AM
Not a single weak track on R.E.M.'s "Life's Rich Paegant" and "Document." Sleater-Kinney's "Dig Me Out" is close, eleven tracks out of thirteen. I could play the Cocteau Twins' "Heaven or Las Vegas" on random for hours without needing to hit the skip button. A case can be made for Talking Heads' "Little Creatures."
Posted by: Ted | September 09, 2005 at 09:51 AM
Van Morrison is indeed a great choice, but a two-record album/CD such as "its too late to stop now" has too many tracks to satisfy the 'no weak tracks' criteria. I'd probably go with "Moondance" instead.
Posted by: David | September 09, 2005 at 10:28 AM
Oh, this is easy. Mike Oldfield. "Tubular Bells". There’s only two tracks and that’s because it needed to be fitted onto an LP. It’s really one track with references on the second to themes from the first.
Of course, the downside of this is that huge numbers of people hate the entire thing instead of just a few tracks on a more normal album.
Posted by: Tim Worstall | September 10, 2005 at 06:20 AM
This quickly gets down to personal taste, as in "what kind of music do you like?"
For me, the answer is obvious: Who's Next. Not only no weak tracks, but no tracks that don't absolutely kick ass.
Posted by: Pete | September 10, 2005 at 02:27 PM