Interesting argument that the Supreme Court's 1971 decision in Griggs v. Duke Power has adversely affected higher education.
Interesting argument that the Supreme Court's 1971 decision in Griggs v. Duke Power has adversely affected higher education.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9b9953ef00e550350a8b8834
The comments to this entry are closed.
Lotta truth there, but I don't think college administrations (and perhaps many professors in 'Studies' disciplines) think there is an adverse effect to transferring money from the pockets of families and the federal govt (taxpayers) to their own.
Posted by: JorgXMcKie | December 01, 2006 at 10:45 AM
A very interesting argument by Gallaway. It's nice to know emeritus econ profs can still come up with ideas.
Jorg has a point. But I suppose what Craig had in mind is that higher ed has lowered standards in order to absorb these students.
Posted by: John B. Chilton | December 01, 2006 at 12:35 PM
NC State Senator Fred Smith is probably the biggest advocate for education reform -- from grade school through university. From an economics standpoint: Are people getting there buck's worth in NC?
Posted by: Nathan Tabor | December 02, 2006 at 03:19 PM
there = their
Posted by: Nathan Tabor | December 02, 2006 at 03:20 PM