Subscribe in a reader






Buy Conservative Advertising

Wikio - Top Blogs

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


No one but the author bears any responsibility for the non-advertising content on this blog. AND PLEASE NOTE: the author neither necessarily uses nor endorses any product advertised on this blog.

« STDs, fish oil, and a mini-rant about the media | Main | I've heard this before »

June 02, 2008

A not-so-good result of women's suffrage

I don't intend to offend any of my female readers--as noted recently, I've been married for 30 years, and I have two daughters--but as a group, women in the U.S. bear a significant part of the responsibilty for our (too) Big Government.

(By the way, Rush Limbaugh will supposedly be discussing John's research on this topic today.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9b9953ef00e552921b738833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A not-so-good result of women's suffrage:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

kyle N

BULLETIN :: THIS JUST IN :: Women are different than men. Women want security (even false security it seems)while more men are self motivated. Thus women will respond to socialist schemes on the average more than men.

I have been knowing this for a long time.

PLW

Bah.. I bet if only women were allowed to vote originally and then we opened the vote to economically subjugated men, the size of government would grow too.

John Lott

Dear Kyle:

I think that we tried to account for opening up the vote to these "economically subjugated men" that you refer to. Please see this:

http://ssrn.com/abstract=160530

The comments to this entry are closed.

Powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003

Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog