If there can be "chick flicks" why can't there be chick cars?
Brilliant, brutal assault on bad writing, bad thinking, and bad behavior

Salaries of economics majors once again

The Wall Street Journal ran--I don't think a subscription is required, but it might--the results of  "a year-long survey of 1.2 million people with only a bachelor's degree by PayScale Inc". (More on the survey's methology here.)

One table shows the "Starting Median Salary" for "50 popular Bachelor's degree majors".  Economics is ranked 13th with a reported $50,100. Seven types of engineering, computer science, and physics are ranked higher. (Two of the remaining majors ranked above economics are "Physician Assistant" and "Construction", both of which I would be very surprised to learn constitute a "major" at many schools.) The unweighted median of the 50 majors is $40,850.

Another column of the same table shows "Mid-Career Median Salary". Here, economics ranks 5th, behind only chemical, computer, electrical, and aerospace engineering. (The number reported is $98,600; the unweighted median of the 50 majors is $72,000.)

Just to be clear: I make absolutely no claim that economics training accounts for all, or even a a substantial part, of the apparently high salaries of economics majors. A substantial part is undoubtedly due to the kinds of students who choose to major in economics. And, as a couple of commenters reminded me the last time I posted about salaries, the availability of majors differs importantly across schools. (For instance, Duke doesn't have an undergraduate business management major; a lot of kids interested in finance or general management there major in economics. A lot of less selective state schools, on the other hand, do have business management majors.)

Still, it's at least a little interesting. Especially when you consider that this survey omits folks with MBAs, JDs, MDs, and other graduate degrees.